For your initial post, discuss at least one of the readings that you intend to use in the reading reaction journal. Did you learn something from it, disagree with one of the main arguments, or still have questions? 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/23/in-a-post-fergurson-world-americans-increasingly-doubt-the-notion-of-colorblind-justice/?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonposthttps://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/02/11/275087586/study-stereotypes-drive-perceptions-of-race
Race and Ideology in a Pandemic: WhitePrivilege and Patterns of Risk Perceptionduring COVID-19Nicholas Vargas1, G. Cristina Mora2, Shannon Gleeson3

(use as reference)

Second part 
Use this journal to keep track of your reactions to readings. For each module, your journal entries should include reactions to at least three readings, 
Each module’s journal entry/ies should address the following three ideas (number answers):
1. Something you learned
2. A major argument made by one of the authors that you disagreed with
3. An important concept that you still don’t understand 
For more detail on these questions, see the complete description in the syllabus.