BUS250 Ashford University Community and Social Responsibility

Hi I need help writing this assignment. Thank you.
Here is the grading rubric, to go along with the assignment instructions I just sent you. Thank you.
Description:
Total Possible Score: 31.00
Explains If the Organization Acted in a Socially Responsible and Ethical Manner to the IncidentTotal: 5.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly explains if the organization acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner to the incident.
Proficient – Explains if the organization acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner to the incident. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially explains if the organization acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner to the incident. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain if the organization acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner to the incident; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of whether the organization acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner to the incident is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes What the Organization Could Have Done DifferentlyTotal: 5.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes what the organization could have done differently.
Proficient – Describes what the organization could have done differently. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially describes what the organization could have done differently. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe what the organization could have done differently; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of what the organization could have done differently is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes Who or What Was Responsible for the IncidentTotal: 5.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes who or what was responsible for the incident.
Proficient – Describes who or what was responsible for the incident. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially describes who or what was responsible for the incident. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the best way to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description for who or what was responsible for the incident is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains the Best Way to Ensure That Similar Incidents Do Not Occur AgainTotal: 5.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively explains the best way to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again.
Proficient – Explains the best way to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially explains the best way to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the best way to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of the best way to ensure that similar incidents do not occur again is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Recommends the Best Way for Society and Stakeholders to Protect Against Similar Incidents in the FutureTotal: 5.00
Distinguished – Thoroughly recommends the best way for society and stakeholders to protect against similar incidents in the future.
Proficient – Recommends the best way for society and stakeholders to protect against similar incidents in the future. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Partially recommends the best way for society and stakeholders to protect against similar incidents in the future. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to recommend the best way for society and stakeholders to protect against similar incidents in the future; however, the recommendation is not the best way to protect against similar incidents, and/or significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The recommendation of the best way for society and stakeholders to protect against similar incidents in the future is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and MechanicsTotal: 2.00
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Bel