FolderSupplier Selection ReportInstructions You are chief purchasing officer (CPO) of a large organization of your choice, and you are in need of a new supplier for a high-value good or service. Describe specifically how you will evaluate suppliers and how you will select the best supplier. (Three to four pages, double spaced, 12-point font, one-inch margins.)Required Elements of the Supplier Selection Report:Describe specifically how you will evaluate suppliersDescribe how you will select the best supplierFor the selected supplier, determine which specific performance measures will go on their supplier scorecard. Be specific and provide examples required Formatting of Supplier Selection Report:This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, and three to four pages in length excluding the title page and reference pageTitle pageUse headings to help organize the papers APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes.

Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary.Submit paper in the Assignment Folder. This paper is due at the end of week 3.Due DateJul 5, 2015 11:59 PMHide RubricsRubric Name: Written Assignment (20%)7 pointsdemonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions5.95 pointsshows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions5.25 pointsshows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion4.55 pointsshows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions3.85 pointslacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims7 pointsarguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts5.95 pointsarguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate students understanding of the material and concepts5.25 pointsarguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material4.55 pointsarguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material3.85 pointsa meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist3 pointsdemonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment2.55 pointsdemonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment2.25 pointsdemonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment1.95 pointsfailed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment1.65 pointsdid not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements2 pointswriting is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability1.7 pointsmost ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues1.5 pointswordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar1.3 pointsunclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues1.1 pointslargely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure1 pointno APA style errors0.85 pointsattempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present0.75 pointsattempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document0.65 pointsattempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other0.55 pointsno attempt at APA styleYou are chief purchasing officer (CPO) of a large organization of your choice, and you are in need of a new supplier for a high-value good or service. Describe specifically how you will evaluate suppliers and how you will select the best supplier. (Three to four pages, double spaced, 12-point font, one-inch margins.)Required Elements of the Supplier Selection Report:Required Formatting of Supplier Selection Report:Hide Rubricsdemonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusionsshows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusionsshows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusionshows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusionslacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claimsarguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and conceptsarguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate students understanding of the material and conceptsarguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of materialarguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the materiala meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not existdemonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignmentdemonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignmentdemonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignmentfailed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignmentdid not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirementswriting is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readabilitymost ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issueswordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammarunclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issueslargely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structureno APA style errorsattempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are presentattempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the documentattempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the otherno attempt at APA style